Complete Health Indicator Report of Deaths due to Cervical Cancer
Definition
Deaths with malignant neoplasm (cancer) of the cervix uteri as the underlying cause of death ICD-10 code: C53Numerator
Number of deaths among females due to cancer of the uterine cervixDenominator
Total number of females in the populationWhy Is This Important?
Cervical cancer is highly preventable because screening tests and a vaccine to prevent human papillomavirus (HPV) infections are available. When cervical cancer is found early, it is highly treatable and associated with long survival and good quality of life.[https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/cervical/basic_info/ ^1^]Healthy People Objective: Reduce the death rate from cancer of the uterine cervix
U.S. Target: 2.2 deaths per 100,000 females (age-adjusted)State Target: 1.8 deaths per 100,000 females (age-adjusted)
Other Objectives
'''Revised Healthy New Jersey 2020 Objective CA-4''': Reduce the age-adjusted mortality rate due to uterine cervix cancer per 100,000 standard female population to 1.8 for the total population, 1.4 among Whites, 3.6 among Blacks, and 2.8 among Hispanics. '''Original Healthy New Jersey 2020 Objective CA-4''': Reduce the age-adjusted mortality rate due to uterine cervix cancer per 100,000 standard female population to 1.9 for the total population, 1.6 among Whites, and 3.6 among Blacks.How Are We Doing?
The death rate due to cervical cancer is declining and the revised Healthy New Jersey 2020 target for the total female population was achieved in 2020.How Do We Compare With the U.S.?
The age-adjusted death rate due to cervical cancer is essentially the same in New Jersey and the U.S.Available Services
The [http://www.nj.gov/health/ces/public/resources/njceed.shtml New Jersey Cancer Education and Early Detection (NJCEED) Program] provides comprehensive outreach, education and screening services for cervical cancer.Related Indicators
Relevant Population Characteristics
Sociodemographic characteristics associated with delays in follow-up care for abnormal cervical cancer screening results in New Jersey include nativity [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612267/ (Tsui et al., 2019.)].Health Care System Factors
Women who have had an HPV vaccine still need to undergo cervical cancer screening because the vaccine does not fully protect against all the strains of the virus and other risk factors that can cause cervical cancer.Related Health Care System Factors Indicators:
Related Risk Factors Indicators:
Related Health Status Outcomes Indicators:
Data Tables
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cervical Cancer, by Year, New Jersey and the United States, 2000-2020 (HNJ2020)
US/NJ | Year | Deaths per 100,000 Female Population | Lower Limit | Upper Limit | Numer- ator | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Record Count: 42 | ||||||
US | 2000 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 4,200 | |
US | 2001 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 4,092 | |
US | 2002 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 3,952 | |
US | 2003 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 3,919 | |
US | 2004 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 3,850 | |
US | 2005 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 3,924 | |
US | 2006 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 3,976 | |
US | 2007 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 4,021 | |
US | 2008 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 4,008 | |
US | 2009 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 3,909 | |
US | 2010 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 3,939 | |
US | 2011 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 4,092 | |
US | 2012 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 4,074 | |
US | 2013 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 4,217 | |
US | 2014 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 4,115 | |
US | 2015 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 4,175 | |
US | 2016 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 4,188 | |
US | 2017 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 4,208 | |
US | 2018 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 4,138 | |
US | 2019 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 4,152 | |
US | 2020 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 4,272 | |
NJ | 2000 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 132 | |
NJ | 2001 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 150 | |
NJ | 2002 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 116 | |
NJ | 2003 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 3.3 | 136 | |
NJ | 2004 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 131 | |
NJ | 2005 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 132 | |
NJ | 2006 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 149 | |
NJ | 2007 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 2.6 | 103 | |
NJ | 2008 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 2.5 | 104 | |
NJ | 2009 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 130 | |
NJ | 2010 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 125 | |
NJ | 2011 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 137 | |
NJ | 2012 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 126 | |
NJ | 2013 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 2.3 | 104 | |
NJ | 2014 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 110 | |
NJ | 2015 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 114 | |
NJ | 2016 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 2.9 | 136 | |
NJ | 2017 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 114 | |
NJ | 2018 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 112 | |
NJ | 2019 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 110 | |
NJ | 2020 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 105 |
Data Notes
This is Healthy New Jersey 2020 (HNJ2020) Objective CA-4.Data Sources
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Underlying Cause of Death File. CDC WONDER On-line Database accessed at [https://wonder.cdc.gov/Deaths-by-Underlying-Cause.html]
- Death Certificate Database, Office of Vital Statistics and Registry, New Jersey Department of Health
- Population Estimates, [https://www.nj.gov/labor/lpa/dmograph/est/est_index.html State Data Center], New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cervical Cancer, by Year and Race/Ethnicity, New Jersey, 2000-2020 (HNJ2020)
Race/Ethnicity | Year | Deaths per 100,000 Female Population | Lower Limit | Upper Limit | Numer- ator | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Record Count: 63 | ||||||
White | 2000 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 3.0 | 85 | |
White | 2001 | 3.1 | 2.4 | 3.7 | 109 | |
White | 2002 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 70 | |
White | 2003 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 85 | |
White | 2004 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 2.8 | 82 | |
White | 2005 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 3.2 | 92 | |
White | 2006 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.8 | 86 | |
White | 2007 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 62 | |
White | 2008 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 67 | |
White | 2009 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 2.7 | 79 | |
White | 2010 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 71 | |
White | 2011 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 2.8 | 80 | |
White | 2012 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 85 | |
White | 2013 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 61 | |
White | 2014 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 63 | |
White | 2015 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 56 | |
White | 2016 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 82 | |
White | 2017 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 68 | |
White | 2018 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 2.6 | 74 | |
White | 2019 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 53 | |
White | 2020 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 65 | |
Black | 2000 | 5.6 | 3.7 | 7.5 | 29 | |
Black | 2001 | 4.6 | 2.8 | 6.3 | 24 | |
Black | 2002 | 5.1 | 3.3 | 7.0 | 28 | |
Black | 2003 | 6.6 | 4.5 | 8.6 | 36 | |
Black | 2004 | 5.6 | 3.7 | 7.5 | 32 | |
Black | 2005 | 4.2 | 2.6 | 5.9 | 24 | |
Black | 2006 | 6.9 | 4.8 | 9.0 | 40 | |
Black | 2007 | 4.0 | 2.4 | 5.7 | 23 | |
Black | 2008 | ** | 14 | |||
Black | 2009 | 3.7 | 2.2 | 5.2 | 22 | |
Black | 2010 | 5.5 | 3.6 | 7.3 | 35 | |
Black | 2011 | 5.2 | 3.4 | 7.0 | 33 | |
Black | 2012 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 23 | |
Black | 2013 | 4.1 | 2.5 | 5.8 | 27 | |
Black | 2014 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 4.8 | 23 | |
Black | 2015 | 4.3 | 2.6 | 5.9 | 29 | |
Black | 2016 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 4.4 | 22 | |
Black | 2017 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 25 | |
Black | 2018 | ** | 15 | |||
Black | 2019 | 3.9 | 2.4 | 5.5 | 27 | |
Black | 2020 | ** | 19 | |||
Hispanic | 2000 | ** | 11 | |||
Hispanic | 2001 | ** | 15 | |||
Hispanic | 2002 | ** | 14 | |||
Hispanic | 2003 | ** | 11 | |||
Hispanic | 2004 | ** | 12 | |||
Hispanic | 2005 | ** | 13 | |||
Hispanic | 2006 | ** | 19 | |||
Hispanic | 2007 | ** | 9 | |||
Hispanic | 2008 | ** | 15 | |||
Hispanic | 2009 | 4.3 | 2.8 | 5.8 | 23 | |
Hispanic | 2010 | ** | 14 | |||
Hispanic | 2011 | ** | 15 | |||
Hispanic | 2012 | ** | 14 | |||
Hispanic | 2013 | ** | 12 | |||
Hispanic | 2014 | 3.1 | 1.9 | 4.2 | 21 | |
Hispanic | 2015 | 3.1 | 1.9 | 4.3 | 22 | |
Hispanic | 2016 | 3.0 | 1.9 | 4.2 | 22 | |
Hispanic | 2017 | ** | 15 | |||
Hispanic | 2018 | ** | 13 | |||
Hispanic | 2019 | ** | 18 | |||
Hispanic | 2020 | ** | 14 |
Data Notes
This is a Healthy New Jersey 2020 (HNJ2020) Objective CA-4. Data for White and Black do not include Hispanics. The number of deaths among Asian women is too small to calculate reliable rates. **Number of deaths too small to calculate a reliable rate.Data Sources
- Death Certificate Database, Office of Vital Statistics and Registry, New Jersey Department of Health
- Population Estimates, [https://www.nj.gov/labor/lpa/dmograph/est/est_index.html State Data Center], New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cervical Cancer by Race/Ethnicity, New Jersey, 2018-2020
Race/Ethnicity | Deaths per 100,000 Female Population | Lower Limit | Upper Limit | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Record Count: 6 | ||||||
White | 1.8 | 1.5 | 2.1 | |||
Black | 2.9 | 2.1 | 3.7 | |||
Hispanic | 1.8 | 1.3 | 2.3 | |||
Asian | ** | |||||
New Jersey | 1.9 | 1.7 | 2.2 | |||
United States | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.2 |
Data Notes
** Number of deaths is too small to calculate a reliable rate.Data Sources
- Death Certificate Database, Office of Vital Statistics and Registry, New Jersey Department of Health
- Population Estimates, [https://www.nj.gov/labor/lpa/dmograph/est/est_index.html State Data Center], New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development
References and Community Resources
1. Basic Information About Cervical Cancer: [https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/cervical/basic_info/] National Cancer Institute: [https://www.cancer.gov/types/cervical] NJ Cancer Incidence Data: [http://www.nj.gov/health/ces/cancer-researchers/cancer-data/]
Page Content Updated On 04/28/2022,
Published on 04/28/2022